ICC meet has started in Hong Kong to improve the simple game of Cricket on the MCC Cricket committes few recommendations.Whenever you here the implementation of UDRS all that one hears is BCCI.They say BCCI rules the ICC and everything else,can some one rule an international organisation just on the basis of money and revenue ??
They say BCCI is stopping the implementations of UDRS. Niranjan Shah (BCCI official ) explained to all about the economic feasibility of the system, but the mindset towards BCCI is such now that even a deaf man will recognize a BCCI official speech.Why did this whole thing come up ??? What went so wrong that all countries are running after it ???? Before going to that there are few more rules that I think will improve the game in lot better way than the UDRS.
Cricket has always been a batsmen's game.You can have a certain batsmen come down the pitch and smack the bowler out of the ground but at the same time if the bowlers crosses a line , that's a free-hit for the batsmen, fairness ???? A batsmen can wander around his crease and still play shots , but if the bowler's foot cuts the back lines its again a no-ball ????? Experts say after all the batsmen is looking for runs and is innovative enough to do so, well the bowlers are also humans even they should be given the same freedom.Switch hit ,its already been discussed about how it really favours the batsmen,Everytime we want the bowlers to come up with some thing new within the laws , why cant we ask the same to batsmen??? Umpires Rules says the batsmen cant be given out if the ball touches any equipment used by the fielders (like an Helmet), but they will give runs to team if the ball hits the batsmen helmet and goes for 4 Leg Byes, Why is it a crime being a bowler ?????
UDRS ,as told is to reduce the horror umpiring decisions, we always forget that that can be done by catching out players.Players who know they are out and should walk.When you want every possible chance as a batsmen,you want technology,don't you need to be honest and brave enough to walk when you knick it.You want Umpires to be helped .then why not giving them the power to consult the 3rd Umpire for it whenever they want ??? When a batsmen gets out if he is wrongly given out , why is the 3rd Umpire quiet ??? He can see the fault and help the on-field umpires by telling them what actually happened.Won't this improve the over all Umpiring , but nope we want technology, why all this years cricket lived with technology or Umpires ???? Yes today too we can survive.
What BCCI told that the cant afford $60,000 per day in a match for UDRS,why is that so wrongly taken ???? If you are in the University Exam section you know students copy and cheat so will u set up a 50,000 network set up in all the states to catch those few cheats ??? No u wont , that's not the want.You need to realize that the decisions can be made,those horrors can be avoided with the collaboration of the available 3 umpires.You can think of implementing UDRS when you have full stands filled with people since that will help you recover the money.UDRS is costly when we see 1000 people watching a dead rubber.ICC gave an option and BCCI upheld it, If ICC wants this dearly they can just force it as Boycott Sir rightly said to outvote BCCI. But first better look at the idiotic rules and then lets turn to technology.We have already complexed this game lot more please Lets keep this simple silly.
They say BCCI is stopping the implementations of UDRS. Niranjan Shah (BCCI official ) explained to all about the economic feasibility of the system, but the mindset towards BCCI is such now that even a deaf man will recognize a BCCI official speech.Why did this whole thing come up ??? What went so wrong that all countries are running after it ???? Before going to that there are few more rules that I think will improve the game in lot better way than the UDRS.Cricket has always been a batsmen's game.You can have a certain batsmen come down the pitch and smack the bowler out of the ground but at the same time if the bowlers crosses a line , that's a free-hit for the batsmen, fairness ???? A batsmen can wander around his crease and still play shots , but if the bowler's foot cuts the back lines its again a no-ball ????? Experts say after all the batsmen is looking for runs and is innovative enough to do so, well the bowlers are also humans even they should be given the same freedom.Switch hit ,its already been discussed about how it really favours the batsmen,Everytime we want the bowlers to come up with some thing new within the laws , why cant we ask the same to batsmen??? Umpires Rules says the batsmen cant be given out if the ball touches any equipment used by the fielders (like an Helmet), but they will give runs to team if the ball hits the batsmen helmet and goes for 4 Leg Byes, Why is it a crime being a bowler ?????
UDRS ,as told is to reduce the horror umpiring decisions, we always forget that that can be done by catching out players.Players who know they are out and should walk.When you want every possible chance as a batsmen,you want technology,don't you need to be honest and brave enough to walk when you knick it.You want Umpires to be helped .then why not giving them the power to consult the 3rd Umpire for it whenever they want ??? When a batsmen gets out if he is wrongly given out , why is the 3rd Umpire quiet ??? He can see the fault and help the on-field umpires by telling them what actually happened.Won't this improve the over all Umpiring , but nope we want technology, why all this years cricket lived with technology or Umpires ???? Yes today too we can survive.What BCCI told that the cant afford $60,000 per day in a match for UDRS,why is that so wrongly taken ???? If you are in the University Exam section you know students copy and cheat so will u set up a 50,000 network set up in all the states to catch those few cheats ??? No u wont , that's not the want.You need to realize that the decisions can be made,those horrors can be avoided with the collaboration of the available 3 umpires.You can think of implementing UDRS when you have full stands filled with people since that will help you recover the money.UDRS is costly when we see 1000 people watching a dead rubber.ICC gave an option and BCCI upheld it, If ICC wants this dearly they can just force it as Boycott Sir rightly said to outvote BCCI. But first better look at the idiotic rules and then lets turn to technology.We have already complexed this game lot more please Lets keep this simple silly.
